Jump to content

  1. 0
  2. 0
  3. 0/5

Rate this Topic

- - - - -

[ROM][4.2.2][Linaro] CM10.1 Unofficial Builds

  • Please log in to reply

OP tiny4579

tiny4579

Kernel Hacker

Posted 14 April 2013 - 06:40 PM #1

This thread is dedicated to my CM10.1 builds that will be built whenever I get around to it which will be at least weekly.

When I build it, it's always synced to the latest CM source along with a few additional cherry picks that either add functionality or are bug fixes/improvements.

Download ROM

Use official gapps or one of the below gapps packages
If you want to use the CM camera, wipe /system and flash the ROM and these gapps:
http://goo.im/devs/t...1-no-camera.zip
*New* 3/1 gapps with updated camera and Play Store
http://goo.im/devs/t...130719-TINY.zip


Mirror (thanks MBQ_ on xda for hosting space):
http://mbqonxda.net/...579/gnex/cm10.1

Features
  • CM10.1
  • Linaro optimizations and commits
  • MIUI style Battery bar
  • Bugfixes and improvements from github and gerritt to dalvik including memory leak fixes
TODO
  • Add goo.im update support and instructions to github repo
Build Instructions

Check here if you're curious.

Mods / Fixes

None at the moment

Edited by tiny4579, 19 July 2013 - 12:03 PM.

  • 6 Likes

droidlover

droidlover

Android Lover

Posted 14 April 2013 - 06:42 PM #2

Test drive time! Thanks for this

Sent from my Galaxy Nexus using RootzWiki
  • 0 Likes

klobkelosh

klobkelosh

Super User

  • 329 posts

Posted 14 April 2013 - 07:53 PM #3

Tiny, there's a syntax error on your download link. should be http://goo.im/devs/t...579/gnex/cm10.1
  • 1 Likes

OP tiny4579

tiny4579

Kernel Hacker

Posted 15 April 2013 - 12:56 AM #4

Tiny, there's a syntax error on your download link. should be http://goo.im/devs/t...579/gnex/cm10.1

I actually copied the op from xda and it added an extra http://. Fixed now thanks.

Well actually it was broken in both places but fixed earlier this morning.

Sent from my Galaxy Nexus using Tapatalk 2


Edited by tiny4579, 15 April 2013 - 03:32 AM.

  • 0 Likes

DR3W5K1

DR3W5K1

Nexus Addict

  • 651 posts

Posted 15 April 2013 - 03:01 AM #5

I actually copied the op from xda and it added an extra http://. Fixed now thanks.

Sent from my Galaxy Nexus using Tapatalk 2

Thanks for this tiny Sounds amazing. Not sure if you remember but i to was in the same boat as you. Jumped the cm ship because of evaporating ram and random slow downs.
Once again thanks a million man.
  • 0 Likes

DR3W5K1

DR3W5K1

Nexus Addict

  • 651 posts

Posted 15 April 2013 - 03:20 AM #6

Thanks for this tiny Sounds amazing. Not sure if you remember but i to was in the same boat as you. Jumped the cm ship because of evaporating ram and random slow downs.
Once again thanks a million man.

Will definitely flash this when i get some time.
  • 0 Likes

RTNDO128

RTNDO128

Member

  • 25 posts

Posted 15 April 2013 - 07:05 AM #7

What makes the Linaro builds different than the official builds?
  • 0 Likes

OP tiny4579

tiny4579

Kernel Hacker

Posted 15 April 2013 - 07:19 AM #8

What makes the Linaro builds different than the official builds?

sounds like you're new to the Linaro thing. In short it's an optimized toolchain with optimized compile options that enforces cleaner code. The Linaro team does good work though they're not specifically Android. I also have added changes and code fixes that cm didn't add themselves yet though this is not Linaro specific.

Sent from my Galaxy Nexus using Tapatalk 2


  • 1 Likes

RTNDO128

RTNDO128

Member

  • 25 posts

Posted 15 April 2013 - 07:46 AM #9

sounds like you're new to the Linaro thing. In short it's an optimized toolchain with optimized compile options that enforces cleaner code. The Linaro team does good work though they're not specifically Android. I also have added changes and code fixes that cm didn't add themselves yet though this is not Linaro specific.

Sent from my Galaxy Nexus using Tapatalk 2

Thanks for the response, I'll try your build out today. Out of curiousity, if Linaro produces cleaner builds, why hasn't CM adopted it for their official builds?
  • 0 Likes

OP tiny4579

tiny4579

Kernel Hacker

Posted 15 April 2013 - 08:12 AM #10

Thanks for the response, I'll try your build out today. Out of curiousity, if Linaro produces cleaner builds, why hasn't CM adopted it for their official builds?


Because the performance improvements are not worth the trouble of fixing code that is needed to make it build along with the fact that cm has to support multiple devices and it'd be an extra headache and may introduce new bugs. Also AOSP has a lot of locations in their code that won't build with the Linaro toolchain and compiler flags.

Sent from my Galaxy Nexus using Tapatalk 2


  • 0 Likes