Jump to content


* * * * * 114 votes

[Kernel] [JB 4.2.x] [v6.6, 5/18/13] Leankernel: Minimalistic Kernel


  • Please log in to reply

#4831 david617

david617

    java junkie

  • Members
  • 244 posts

Posted 21 February 2012 - 08:09 PM

View Postskeeter1, on 21 February 2012 - 08:05 PM, said:



system sounds?

Sent from my Transformer Prime TF201 using Tapatalk

Volume is off.

If its not simple, its not correct.


#4832 skeeter1

skeeter1

    Android Beginner

  • Members
  • 90 posts

Posted 21 February 2012 - 08:13 PM

View Postdavid617, on 21 February 2012 - 08:09 PM, said:


Volume is off.

well, I tried... Lol.. I noticed that today, too.. On another ROM/kernel...


Sent from my Transformer Prime TF201 using Tapatalk

#4833 razzbaronz

razzbaronz

    Member

  • Members
  • 96 posts

Posted 21 February 2012 - 08:14 PM

View PostArmanUV, on 21 February 2012 - 03:40 PM, said:


I'm sorry but how is your post relavant to mine?
You said you undervolt with setcpu and get SODs.
I don't undervolt and I get excessive drain.

I see, thought you might be having the same issue. On the leantweaks thread someone said turning off SD and system speed tweaks fixed their drain. Maybe try that.

#4834 imoseyon (OP)

imoseyon

    Developer

  • 2,029 posts

Posted 21 February 2012 - 09:09 PM

View PostSpartan051xKurtA, on 21 February 2012 - 08:08 PM, said:

Hey imo can u explain what this mpu factory override is? I'm seeing it pop up in the other kernel threads? Does this give people the ability to safely over clock past 1.4

Sent from my Galaxy Nexus using Tapatalk

omap4460 chipsets come in two different flavors: "high performance" and "standard". What we got is the "standard" variety which limits mpu to 1.2ghz and iva to 430mhz in hardware. Pretty sure Google did this to 1) extend bettery life and 2) prevent overheating. Up until now I didn't realize that other devs figured out a way to override that. This is why i have you guys - to spy for me! LOL.

In any case, I don't think it's going to be my top priority (since i believe omap4460 at 1.35ghz is fast enough) but I'll look into it at some point. When I do, I'll try to do it myself first instead of kanging.

Edited by imoseyon, 21 February 2012 - 09:09 PM.


#4835 imoseyon (OP)

imoseyon

    Developer

  • 2,029 posts

Posted 21 February 2012 - 09:16 PM

leanKernel v2.2.0

-- Linux 3.0.21 update except for the asoc patch
-- wlan and lte modem wakelock tweaks to reduce the amount of time
they hold their wakelocks.
-- SLUB memory allocator backport up to Linux 3.1
-- lkflash has a 4th option: check kernel versions
-- a small asoc update from android-omap source.

#4836 Spartan051xKurtA

Spartan051xKurtA

    Recovering Flasher

  • Members
  • 648 posts

Posted 21 February 2012 - 09:27 PM

Thanx for the explanation :) well Ill be looking forward to testing out your versions of that i can only imagine what you can come up with. but until then I'll be sticking around.


View Postimoseyon, on 21 February 2012 - 09:09 PM, said:


omap4460 chipsets come in two different flavors: "high performance" and "standard". What we got is the "standard" variety which limits mpu to 1.2ghz and iva to 430mhz in hardware. Pretty sure Google did this to 1) extend bettery life and 2) prevent overheating. Up until now I didn't realize that other devs figured out a way to override that. This is why i have you guys - to spy for me! LOL.

In any case, I don't think it's going to be my top priority (since i believe omap4460 at 1.35ghz is fast enough) but I'll look into it at some point. When I do, I'll try to do it myself first instead of kanging.

Sent from my Galaxy Nexus using Tapatalk

#4837 Arjuna

Arjuna

    Member

  • Members
  • 15 posts

Posted 21 February 2012 - 09:27 PM

View Postimoseyon, on 21 February 2012 - 09:09 PM, said:

This is why i have you guys - to spy for me! LOL.

Me, personally, I’m doing it with pleasure. And if I don’t report any problems, that’s because I don’t have. Using 230-1420, without undervolting (default settings of the kernel), I have always perfect battery life/performance. Only one SOD on 2.0.1 exp.1, and never before, and never after.
Only one question: are they really useful all this undervolting experiments for the battery life? The biggest battery user is the display, so is it really necessary to play with CPU?

#4838 360razir

360razir

    Do I have to wipe?

  • 296 posts

Posted 21 February 2012 - 09:37 PM

View Postimoseyon, on 21 February 2012 - 09:16 PM, said:

leanKernel v2.2.0

Thanks, imo, for all your hard work. Donation sent.

#4839 blaine07

blaine07

    Android Beginner

  • Members
  • 204 posts

Posted 21 February 2012 - 09:45 PM

A kernel just doesn't get anymore rock solid...

Posted Image

Thanks IMO!


Sent from my Galaxy Nexus using Tapatalk

#4840 gotwillk

gotwillk

    Super User

  • Members
  • 425 posts

Posted 21 February 2012 - 10:16 PM

View Postblaine07, on 21 February 2012 - 09:45 PM, said:

A kernel just doesn't get anymore rock solid...

Posted Image

Thanks IMO!


Sent from my Galaxy Nexus using Tapatalk
good lord! 99 hrs without a single reboot? how do you do it??