Jump to content


- - - - -

[KERNEL][BFS/CFS] OMFGB Kernel 9/16/2011 [AOSP]


  • Please log in to reply

#21 DRod2169 (OP)

DRod2169

    Developer

  • 229 posts

Posted 26 June 2011 - 09:17 PM

rkchkjhk said:

Will this be the kernel that is released with the mecha nightly for 6/26?
yes. plus overclocking. this kernel and the cfs version are also being included in the omfgb addons app

#22 DRod2169 (OP)

DRod2169

    Developer

  • 229 posts

Posted 26 June 2011 - 09:17 PM

topsite said:

you kernel is great.But can not use this vipermod and Does not support call recording,hope support

Will look in to both of these :tongue2:

#23 GTvert90

GTvert90

    Average Android

  • Members
  • 434 posts

Posted 26 June 2011 - 09:18 PM

Bfs link wont work for me through tapa talk.

How do you call record? That could be useful

Sent from my ThunderBolt using Tapatalk

#24 Smok3d

Smok3d

    Android Apprentice

  • Members
  • 56 posts

Posted 26 June 2011 - 09:18 PM

Will give this a try, thanks brah!

#25 topsite

topsite

    Average Android

  • Members
  • 81 posts

Posted 26 June 2011 - 09:27 PM

vipermod
http://bit.ly/kI3zi4

support call recording kernel
http://mirror.jdkore...osp_v1_bolt.zip

#26 z0mbiexx

z0mbiexx

    Lurker

  • Members
  • 111 posts

Posted 26 June 2011 - 09:53 PM

Still waiting for explanation of bfs and cfs </noob>
\\ snxǝu ʎxɐ1ɐb || AOKP 4.2.1 || Tinykernel || PRIMELC03 || I515.09 V.FF02 I515.FG02 || TWRP 2.3.2.1 //
\\ Nexus 7 16GB || AOKP JB || Trinity || TWRP 2.2.2.0 //

#27 icanhazdroid

icanhazdroid

  • Site Contributor
  • 2,199 posts

Posted 26 June 2011 - 09:56 PM

z0mbiexx said:

Still waiting for explanation of bfs and cfs </noob>

Simply put, BFS will be faster, but lack a little in multitasking.
CFS is general better with multitasking, and sometimes a little smoother.

I prefer BFS, usually a pretty decent speed improvement and honestly multitasking is the same in my opinion

#28 bmerrill63

bmerrill63

    Android Apprentice

  • Members
  • 85 posts

Posted 27 June 2011 - 01:35 AM

z0mbiexx said:

Still waiting for explanation of bfs and cfs </noob>


I didnt get it either when i first started flashing kernels. Hope this will help, it did for me. http://www.stackedno...are-bfs-and-cfs

#29 dickenam

dickenam

    Moderizer Extraordinaire

  • 853 posts

Posted 27 June 2011 - 05:19 AM

z0mbiexx said:

Still waiting for explanation of bfs and cfs </noob>

http://www.cs.unm.ed...kel-schulte.pdf

This is a very extensive paper on CFS and BFS.
More geared towards PCs but still provides useful information.
If a post makes you Le annoyed, please ignore it. If it violates il Forum Rules, please report it. Thanks!

#30 DRod2169 (OP)

DRod2169

    Developer

  • 229 posts

Posted 27 June 2011 - 10:39 AM

icanhazdroid said:

Simply put, BFS will be faster, but lack a little in multitasking.
CFS is general better with multitasking, and sometimes a little smoother.

I prefer BFS, usually a pretty decent speed improvement and honestly multitasking is the same in my opinion

Basically true.

My BFS is tweaked highly though to be better fit for Android. Multitasking isn't a problem.
Also, the added RCU boost helps with high loads, multitasking, etc.